MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408872427 · doi:10.1107/s2059798325002025

<i>InstaMap</i>: instant-NGP for cryo-EM density maps

2025· article· en· W4408872427 on OpenAlexafffund
Geoffrey Woollard, Wenda Zhou, Erik H. Thiede, Chen Lin, Nikolaus Grigorieff, Pilar Cossio, Khanh Dao Duc, Sonya M. Hanson

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Crystallographica Section D Structural Biology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAdvanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceComputer visionArtificial intelligenceProjection (relational algebra)Masking (illustration)Computer graphics (images)Algorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Despite the parallels between problems in computer vision and cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM), many state-of-the-art approaches from computer vision have yet to be adapted for cryo-EM. Within the computer-vision research community, implicits such as neural radiance fields (NeRFs) have enabled the detailed reconstruction of 3D objects from few images at different camera-viewing angles. While other neural implicits, specifically density fields, have been used to map conformational heterogeneity from noisy cryo-EM projection images, most approaches represent volume with an implicit function in Fourier space, which has disadvantages compared with solving the problem in real space, complicating, for instance, masking, constraining physics or geometry, and assessing local resolution. In this work, we build on a recent development in neural implicits, a multi-resolution hash-encoding framework called instant-NGP, that we use to represent the scalar volume directly in real space and apply it to the cryo-EM density-map reconstruction problem (InstaMap). We demonstrate that for both synthetic and real data, InstaMap for homogeneous reconstruction achieves higher resolution at shorter training stages than five other real-spaced representations. We propose a solution to noise overfitting, demonstrate that InstaMap is both lightweight and fast to train, implement masking from a user-provided input mask and extend it to molecular-shape heterogeneity via bending space using a per-image vector field.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Software · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.061

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreSoftware

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActa Crystallographica Section D Structural BiologySame topicAdvanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207