MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408874588 · doi:10.1186/s40850-025-00228-0

The Prussian carp (Carassius gibelio) in Saskatchewan, Canada: current distribution and life history traits of a novel invasive species

2025· article· en· W4408874588 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Shayna N. Cossette, J.E. Stewart, Christopher M. Somers

Bibliographic record

VenueBMC Zoology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFish Ecology and Management Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMitacsCanada Foundation for InnovationUniversity of Regina
KeywordsCarassiusPrussian blueCarpBiologyInvasive speciesDistribution (mathematics)FisheryZoologyEcologyFish <Actinopterygii>ChemistryMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: The Prussian carp (Carassius gibelio) is an invasive fish species from Eurasia that was first found in North America in the Canadian province of Alberta in the early 2000s. In 2018, an established population of Prussian carp was discovered in the neighboring province of Saskatchewan, raising concern for additional spread in Canada and to the USA. RESULTS: Prussian carp in Saskatchewan have colonized the South Saskatchewan River and tributaries and are moving towards additional connected systems to the northeast. Direct access to most of southern Saskatchewan and the USA is currently prevented only by the Qu'Appelle Dam on the South Saskatchewan River at Lake Diefenbaker. Prussian carp populations in Saskatchewan were age-stratified and ranged from hatch size (20 mm) to a maximum of 42.5 cm total length. Aging using otoliths and scales was unreliable, but the largest fish collected were likely > 10 years old. Saskatchewan Prussian carp had mixed ploidies with diploid, triploid, and tetraploid individuals intermixed. In Lake Diefenbaker, only adult female and juvenile fish were detected, but males were present in the Anerley Lakes at low relative abundance. Emergence of young of the year Prussian carp began in early July and continued through August, indicating an extended period of reproduction; however, most spawning likely occurred during mid-June. The timing of spawning overlaps with that of a variety of native sucker and shiner species, but sperm donors for potential gynogenesis remain unidentified. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that invasive Prussian carp are well established in Saskatchewan and will likely use provincial waterbodies as a conduit to colonize more areas in North America.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.926
Threshold uncertainty score0.939

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMC ZoologySame topicFish Ecology and Management StudiesFrench-language works237,207