MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408880509 · doi:10.1002/cjce.25682

Multi‐scale feature fusion network‐based industrial process fault diagnosis method using space–time capsule and classifier optimization

2025· article· en· W4408880509 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Yue Zhao, Jianjun Bai, Limin Wang, Jing Feng

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFault Detection and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtificial intelligenceComputer sciencePattern recognition (psychology)Classifier (UML)FusionScale (ratio)Data miningMachine learningGeographyCartography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This paper introduces a multi‐scale feature fusion deep learning network method for industrial process fault diagnosis based on spatio‐temporal capsules and classifier optimization. In the feature extraction phase, a multi‐scale residual convolution network is initially employed to extract multi‐scale features. Subsequently, the identified fault features are forwarded to the spatio‐temporal capsule network to further extract information related to time and space. After the feature extraction is completed, we replace the traditional softmax classifier with eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) to make the final diagnosis more efficient and faster, avoiding the long diagnosis time caused by complex models. The proposed network fully takes into account the nonlinearity, timing, and high‐dimensionality of the original data. The residual network structure can solve the problem of model degradation caused by the deepening of network layers. The LSTM and capsule network structures can minimize the loss of effective feature information for features extraction and the XGBoost algorithm achieves good classification. This ‘offline training, online diagnosis’ method can avoid lengthy training and effectively improve the fault diagnosis efficiency. Our experiments on chemical engineering processes, such as the Tennessee Eastman (TE) process and industrial coking furnace, show that the proposed method significantly improves fault diagnosis accuracy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical EngineeringSame topicFault Detection and Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207