MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408882835 · doi:10.23977/acss.2025.090116

Research on Design and Optimization of Personalized Network Education System Based on Artificial Intelligence

2025· article· en· W4408882835 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in Computer Signals and Systems · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEducational Reforms and Innovations
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper studies the design and optimization of a personalized network education system based on artificial intelligence (AI). A personalized network education system with hierarchical micro-service architecture is designed. The core technology stack includes Spring Cloud, Docker, React, Secondary, TensorFlow Serving, etc. The system provides accurate learning support for students through core functional modules such as user portrait, knowledge recommendation, path planning, intelligent question answering and early warning of learning situation. The adaptive recommendation engine adopts hybrid recommendation algorithm, combining collaborative filtering and knowledge map embedding, and dynamically adjusts the weight through reinforcement learning to optimize the recommendation effect. Learning path planning uses reinforcement learning to optimize path generation, ensuring that the response time is less than 200ms. Intelligent question answering is based on BERT and BiLSTM, and the problem solving rate is 92%. In the early warning of academic situation, LSTM time series prediction combined with SHAP analysis is used to predict the risk of failing the course three weeks in advance. In the aspect of system optimization, performance bottlenecks were found through stress testing and code analysis, and technologies such as GIN index, Vitess sub-database and sub-table, three-level caching strategy, model quantization compression, batch reasoning and knowledge distillation were adopted, which significantly improved the system performance. AB test results show that after optimization, the concurrent carrying capacity of the system is improved by 192%, the recommended response delay is reduced by 75.6%, and the peak CPU usage of the database is reduced to 47%. In addition, the system also predicts learning hotspots by LSTM to realize dynamic cache preheating, automatically selects the model precision according to the user equipment type, and automatically expands and contracts the capacity of Kubernetes based on Prometheus index, and the response time is less than 10 seconds. This study provides a useful reference for the design and optimization of personalized online education system, and helps to promote the development and application of personalized learning system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.967
Threshold uncertainty score0.241

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it