Evaluation of oxygenation, ventilation, and bloating in alfaxalone anesthetized calves
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Calves commonly undergo abdominal surgery for gastrointestinal and umbilical disease and are typically positioned in dorsal recumbency for the procedure. This poses a high risk for hypoxemia, hypoventilation, bloat and regurgitation. Though these risks are understood, reference values for parameters of oxygenation, ventilation and bloating under anesthesia have not been reported. Alfaxalone is a neuroactive steroid with limited cardiovascular effects that is used in companion animal practice for induction and maintenance of general anesthesia. Though its use in food animals is limited, alfaxalone has been used successfully in sheep and could be used safely in cattle. Demonstrating the safety and efficacy of alfaxalone in calves would promote its viability in food animal medicine. The objectives of this study were to demonstrate a novel anesthetic protocol using a constant rate infusion (CRI) of alfaxalone and to report the cardiopulmonary and blood gas parameters of calves anesthetized in dorsal recumbency with unprotected airways.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".