MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408882981 · doi:10.23977/acss.2025.090114

Research on the design and realization of interactive wearable blindness guidance system based on computer vision

2025· article· en· W4408882981 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in Computer Signals and Systems · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRealization (probability)BlindnessWearable computerComputer scienceHuman–computer interactionComputer visionOptometryArtificial intelligenceEmbedded systemMedicineMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aiming at the problems of single function of navigation aids and limited applicable scenes for visually impaired people traveling at present, this paper proposes an interactive wearable guide system based on computer vision technology. The system integrates a variety of sensors, including infrared rangefinder, ultrasonic sensors and high-definition camera, and is equipped with STM32 microcontroller for efficient data processing, realizing real-time perception of the surrounding environment and accurate identification of obstacles. The system adopts YOLOV7 algorithm to intelligently analyze road conditions and provide accurate and real-time navigation information for visually impaired users through voice and vibration feedback. The system is also equipped with gyroscope and microphone for monitoring the user's movement status and receiving voice commands to realize natural human-computer interaction. The accompanying smartphone APP connects to the system wirelessly via Bluetooth and provides voice and vibration alerts through the headset and built-in motor, providing a convenient user interface. The APP integrates GPS positioning and Baidu map service, which not only records the user's walking route in real time, but also intelligently plans the traveling route and provides voice navigation service. The system is well-designed, integrating advanced technology and humanized interaction, aiming to provide an innovative, reliable and easy-to-use guide solution for the visually impaired.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.357
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvances in Computer Signals and SystemsSame topicGaze Tracking and Assistive TechnologyFrench-language works237,207