MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4408884799 · doi:10.1016/j.jneb.2025.01.017

Cooking Matters for Diabetes: A Curriculum to Support Diabetes Self-Management Among Individuals Facing Food Insecurity

2025· article· en· W4408884799 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jennifer Garner, Jennifer C Shrodes, Katharine Garrity, Songzhu Zhao, Emmanuella B. Aboagye‐Mensah, Amaris Williams, Guy Brock, Jennifer L. Hefner, Daniel M. Walker, Joshua J. Joseph

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Nutrition Education and Behavior · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicFood Security and Health in Diverse Populations
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Center for Advancing Translational SciencesNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney DiseasesNational Institutes of HealthOhio State University
KeywordsFood insecurityDiabetes mellitusCurriculumEnvironmental healthDiabetes managementSelf-managementGerontologyMedicinePsychologyFood securityType 2 diabetesGeographyPedagogyEndocrinologyAgriculture

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Food insecurity and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) are related issues affecting a large portion of the US population. Food insecurity is the socioeconomic condition of limited or uncertain access to adequate food, which affected 13.5% of US households in 2023.1 Diabetes affects a similar proportion of the US population, with approximately 12% (more than 38 million people) estimated in 2021.2 Adults who face food insecurity are 2–3 times more likely to have diabetes than that of adults with food security.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.415
Teacher spread0.368 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Nutrition Education and Behavior→Same topicFood Security and Health in Diverse Populations→French-language works237,207→