Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper explores our relationship to data as a circle of signification and sense. It leads off by describing the grounding epistemic role played by Charles Sanders Peirce's semiotic in establishing data's circle of sense, then goes on to develop an alternative perspective owed to Gilles Deleuze's philosophy of the sign. Leaning heavily on recent secondary literature, the paper spends time explaining how Deleuze, sometimes in concert with Félix Guattari, took up and responded to Peircean semiotics, mutating the latter's thinking in important ways. This prefatory work organizes the original contribution of the paper, which is to ask: how might Deleuze's view of nonsense as it plays a role in his perspective on the circle of sense come to bear on our future relationship to social information systems? Probing the possibility of integrating Deleuze's perspective on nonsense into existing approaches to data, the paper experiments with his event-focused view of signification and sense through a series of interconnected diagrams.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it