MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408887279 · doi:10.46743/1540-580x/2023.2322

Prevalence and Risk Factors for Anxiety in Medical and Allied Health Students in the United States and Canada

2023· article· en· W4408887279 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Samantha A. Scott

Bibliographic record

VenueInternet Journal of Allied Health Sciences and Practice · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnxietyFamily medicinePsychologyEnvironmental healthMedicinePsychiatryGerontologyClinical psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose The purpose of this study was to determine the current known prevalence and risk factors for anxiety in medical and allied health profession students. The framing question for this systematic review was, “What is the prevalence of and mitigation of risk factors for anxiety among medical and allied health profession students?” Method CINAHL, Medline, PsychInfo, and SportDiscus were searched for peer-reviewed English-language articles published between January 2000 to October 2020 reporting primary data on anxiety in U.S. and Canadian medical and allied health students. Searches used combinations of Medical Subject Heading terms students, allied health, nursing, medical, athletic training, occupational therapy, physical therapy, physician assistant, anxiety, anxiety disorders, stress, psychological distress, or emotional regulation. Reference lists were inspected to identify additional relevant articles. Demographic information, instruments used, prevalence data, risk factors, and qualitative findings on student anxiety were abstracted. Results The search identified eleven studies that met the authors’ criteria. Most studies were cross- sectional surveys that evaluated various categories of psychological distress and associated behaviors. The studies suggest a wide range of prevalence rates of clinically significant anxiety with inconclusive results when differences in rates of anxiety by gender, age, class year or school were assessed. Clinical experience, time management, coping strategies, social support, and academic performance were all found to be risk factors associated with student’s anxiety. Conclusion Medical and allied health education can be a time that contributes to psychological distress in students. Prevalence, prevention, and management of anxiety, stress, and depression should be explored further, particularly within allied health professions to provide better insight into how educators can provide support to their students. Additionally, the ability to identify students at risk for anxiety and other mental health problems may be an important step in prevention moving forward.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.020
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.237
Threshold uncertainty score0.698

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0200.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.096
GPT teacher head0.502
Teacher spread0.406 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternet Journal of Allied Health Sciences and PracticeSame topicHealthcare professionals’ stress and burnoutFrench-language works237,207