Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article explores the development of the facility management profession in the 1960s and 70s in relation to the discipline of architecture. Postwar designs for large, modular offices resonated with the radical visions of responsive environments put forward by Yona Friedman, Cedric Price, and other neo-futurist architects, but raised practical challenges of implementing change and reconciling conflicting user desires. Trained architects might have seemed ideally suited to mediate relationships between organisations, users, and buildings on an ongoing basis, but facility management ultimately became a separate industry. To explain why, the article explores how the firms Quickborner Team, Herman Miller, and DEGW identified new forms of expertise in managing spatial change. By the late 1970s, the early optimism that flexible work environments would increase users’ autonomy receded, and economic shifts undermined utopian hopes that facility management would mature into a subdiscipline of architecture. As corporate real estate became a fungible commodity, facility management evolved into a paramanagerial function charged with planning and maintaining efficient layouts of office cubicles and computer infrastructure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it