Application and exploration in intelligent recruitment in personnel management system of universities based on big data models
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Traditional personnel recruitment methods are often inefficient and struggle to find candidates who meet job requirements. In this paper, we first develop a comprehensive personnel management system for colleges and universities that streamlines the recruitment process and information management. Next, recruitment data from the system is analyzed using the fuzzy C-means algorithm to cluster applicant profiles and extract position-specific user characteristics. Finally, a joint embedded neural network is employed to match applicant profiles with job positions by optimizing an objective function. Experimental results demonstrate a high job matching rate (up to 98.1%), a significantly reduced recruitment cycle (from job posting to candidate onboarding in 25 days), and a system response time as low as 0.5 seconds. These findings highlight the effectiveness of big data technology in providing timely feedback, reducing recruitment costs and staff workload, and promoting the intelligent development of talent recruitment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it