Enhancement of a distribution system performance based on a Nested Corona Herd Immunity Optimizer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Electrical distribution systems are essential for the delivery of power to end users.Enhancing the performance of these systems is a strategic approach to meet increasing demands on the electrical grid.Recently, many types of power electronics converters are employed for such enhancement of performance.These converters are either used to alter the topology of the system such as Soft Open Points (SOPs) or are connected directly at buses.For an achievable enhancement of distribution system to occur, an optimization problem must be articulated.In this work a Corona Herd Immunity Optimizer (CHIO), which is inspired by the world wide Corona outbreak, is employed to find the optimal apparent power flow, these converters must condition to achieve a desired objective.In this context two CHIOs are used consecutively to achieve minimal active losses through the connection of two back to back converters and maintain voltage profile within limits using a power converter that condition reactive power flow.Results underscore CHIO effectiveness in minimizing power losses and maintaining voltage stability, demonstrating its potential to enhance overall system efficiency.Simulations conducted in MATLAB, on a standard distribution system, evaluated multiple power electronics converter positions, incorporating Distributed Generation, further affirming the robustness of the CHIO approach.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".