MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408903604 · doi:10.1021/acscatal.4c07971

En Route to Direct Cross-Coupling between Carbonyl Derivatives and Allyl Alcohols via Hydrazones

2025· article· en· W4408903604 on OpenAlexafffund
Ruohua Gui, Faraz Alaghemand, Rustam Z. Khaliullin, Chao‐Jun Li

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Catalysis · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicCyclopropane Reaction Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersFonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les TechnologiesCanada Foundation for InnovationNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research ChairsMcGill University
KeywordsChemistryAllyl alcoholCatalysisCoupling (piping)Direct couplingOrganic chemistryPhotochemistryMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Allylic cross-couplings are pivotal in the organic chemistry toolbox; however, traditional methods require the extensive use of noble metals and are limited to activated substrates. To date, allylic cross-couplings that utilize affordable metals and unactivated allylic alcohols remain unexplored. Herein, we report a distinct coupling of ubiquitous and commercially available aldehydes with unactivated allyl alcohols, which also benefits from generating only water and nitrogen gas as innocuous byproducts. This operationally simple and mild methodology enables the direct allylation of carbonyl derivatives, affording alkene products in moderate to high yields across 40 substrates. The reported conditions tolerate both aryl and alkyl aldehydes, as well as ketones with a variety of functional groups. Notably, our strategy facilitates the expedited synthesis of value-added chemicals while producing environmentally benign byproducts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.091
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS CatalysisSame topicCyclopropane Reaction MechanismsFrench-language works237,207