MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408904076 · doi:10.1021/jacs.5c00854

An Amplificative Detection Approach for Autocatalytic Sensing of Ethylene

2025· article· en· W4408904076 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Autumn I. Giger, Jaiden C. Voldrich, Brian W. Michel

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMarine Toxins and Detection Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute of Food and AgricultureNational Institute of General Medical SciencesUniversity of OttawaU.S. Department of AgricultureNational Science FoundationNational Institutes of HealthUniversitetet i Bergen
KeywordsChemistryEthyleneAutocatalysisAnalyteCatalysisMetathesisCombinatorial chemistryOlefin fiberOlefin metathesisOrganic chemistryChromatographyPolymerization

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Amplified sensing offers the potential for high sensitivity; however, the vast majority of molecular strategies involve stoichiometric detection and signal transduction, including numerous recent examples of systems inspired by transition-metal-catalyzed reactions. Activation of latent precatalysts by a target analyte represents an attractive strategy for detecting low-concentration species. Analyte amplification represents another attractive approach, akin to PCR-based assays. Here we report an autocatalytic detection system based on the ethylene activation of Ru-I2 olefin metathesis precatalysts. Signal transduction is amplified by both catalytic ring closing metathesis of profluorescent substrates and ethylene propagation to activate additional units of catalyst. High sensitivity is observed as a result of this dual-mode amplified detection of ethylene. Detection of endogenous ethylene from fruit and oxidation-decomposition of polyunsaturated fatty acids via lipid peroxides is demonstrated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.217
Threshold uncertainty score0.199

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Chemical SocietySame topicMarine Toxins and Detection MethodsFrench-language works237,207