Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Living Newspaper 2.0, inspired by the Federal Theatre Project’s innovative approach to socially conscious drama, revitalizes the historical Living Newspaper tradition by blending historical techniques with contemporary collaborative practices and experimentations with digital technologies to engage modern audiences. This three-part article examines the creation and implementation of the Living Newspaper 2.0. In Part I, I will provide a contextual background for the Living Newspaper 2.0, exploring its roots and the critical need for socially conscious drama in today’s socio-political landscape. Part II will focus on the methodology behind its creation, detailing the integration of traditional theatrical techniques with modern collaborative practices and digital technologies. The final instalment of this series, Part III, not only discusses the practical applications and performance outcomes of the Living Newspaper 2.0 but also includes an opportunity to view the final performance of Always Present, Rarely Recognized: A Living Newspaper on Misogyny, allowing readers to witness firsthand the culmination of this theatrical process. Each segment aims to highlight the blend of history, methodology, and practical implementation that makes the Living Newspaper 2.0 a pivotal instrument in the realm of political theatre creation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".