Strategies and Practice of Mental Health Education for Primary and Secondary School Students from the Perspective of Positive Psychology
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study is devoted to the in-depth analysis of the application and concrete practice of positive psychology in the field of mental health education in primary and secondary schools. In the introduction, the article expounds the necessity and urgency of the research, points out the increasingly serious mental health problems of primary and secondary school students, and emphasizes the urgent need to find efficient educational strategies to improve the present situation. This paper discusses the challenges that may be encountered in the process of implementing the mental health education strategy for primary and secondary school students, including the shortage of teachers, the lack of educational resources and the cognitive deviation of parents and society. In order to meet these challenges, the article puts forward a series of measures. These include strengthening teacher training to improve teachers' professional quality and educational ability, striving for more educational resources to provide material guarantee for mental health education, and raising parents' and society's awareness and attention to mental health education through publicity and education. The article emphasizes that only by taking effective measures to meet the challenges can we ensure the effective implementation of the strategy and provide a strong guarantee for the healthy psychological growth of primary and secondary school students.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".