MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408910332 · doi:10.18280/jesa.580211

Adaptive Cruise Control System Based Optimal PID Control with SSA

2025· article· en· W4408910332 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Anssam Yahya Kames, Ali Hussien Mary

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal Européen des Systèmes Automatisés · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTraffic control and management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPID controllerCruiseCruise controlControl (management)Control theory (sociology)Control systemComputer scienceControl engineeringEngineeringArtificial intelligenceTemperature controlAerospace engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposed an Adaptive Cruise Control (ACC) control algorithm in vehicles.The ACC aims to determine required acceleration based on the distance measured between cars and the speed of the vehicle itself.The objective of this control system is to follow the front vehicle with a safety distance between lead and ego vehicles.For this purpose, the proposed controller is based on the PI controller applied to a ACC system.The proposed control system consists of two parts: an upper and lower controller.The upper controller decided which mode would be active: distance or speed control.The lower part controller is the PI controller, which determines the appropriate control signal.The Slap Swarm Algorithm (SSA) optimization algorithm has been used for tuning the parameters of the proposed controller.The simulation results of the proposed algorithm show that it provides excellent performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal Européen des Systèmes AutomatisésSame topicTraffic control and managementFrench-language works237,207