MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408912119 · doi:10.21423/aabppro20249141

Evaluation of pain and meloxicam use in neonatal calf diarrhea

2025· article· en· W4408912119 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
H. Neill, Emily J. Reppert, Johann F. Coetzee, Abbie V. Viscardi, M. Weeder, Daniel M. Schwartz, Michael D. Kleinhenz

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Association of Bovine Practitioners Conference Proceedings · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldVeterinary
TopicAnimal health and immunology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMeloxicamDiarrheaMedicineAnesthesiaIntensive care medicineInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Scours is one of the most common neonatal diseases affecting beef and dairy calves. Multiple etiologic agents have been im­plicated. The disease manifests as malabsorptive or secretory diarrhea with inflammation of the intestinal epithelium. Ab­dominal pain is a symptom commonly reported in humans with diarrhea. Meloxicam is approved as an adjunctive therapy in Canada and the European Union. To date, there are no studies assessing measures of pain in scouring calves, and limited in­formation regarding the use of meloxicam as an ancillary ther­apy. The objective of this study was to examine behavioral and physiological outcomes associated with the expression of pain in calves with scours; and the impact administration of meloxi­cam has on reducing pain-related behaviors and outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.344
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Association of Bovine Practitioners Conference ProceedingsSame topicAnimal health and immunologyFrench-language works237,207