MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408921665 · doi:10.1007/s13300-025-01725-8

Systematic Literature Review of the Impact of Type 2 Diabetes and Heart Failure Guideline Adherence on Clinical and Economic Outcomes

2025· review· en· W4408921665 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueDiabetes Therapy · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMedication Adherence and Compliance
Canadian institutionsHealth Sciences CentreSunnybrook Health Science Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMEDLINEIntensive care medicineGuidelineDisease managementType 2 diabetesSystematic reviewDiabetes mellitusClinical trialDiseaseInternal medicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is associated with comorbidities, particularly in the cardiovascular, renal, and metabolic (CVRM) spectrum. Given the complexity of CVRM spectrum diseases and the treatment landscape, treatment guidelines have been established to assist physicians in selecting the most appropriate treatment based on not only patients' primary disease but also their comorbidities. However, the impact of adherence to treatment guidelines on associated outcomes remains unclear. METHODS: A systematic literature review was conducted to evaluate the impact of guideline-based treatment on clinical, economic, and quality-of-life (QoL) outcomes and related comorbidities in the CVRM spectrum or heart failure (HF) alone in individuals with T2DM. The MEDLINE, MEDLINE In-Process, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and EconLit electronic databases were searched to identify relevant peer-reviewed studies published in the United States, Canada, or Germany. The studies were screened and selected for inclusion or exclusion based on populations, interventions, comparators, and study design (PICOS) criteria. RESULTS: Of the 622 records identified, 28 publications met the inclusion criteria. In total, 11 and 16 studies reported adherence to clinical guidelines for T2DM and HF management, respectively. Adherence to T2DM and HF treatment guidelines decreased all-cause mortality and all-cause hospitalizations; furthermore, adherence to T2DM guidelines decreased hospitalizations due to HF, myocardial infarction, and stroke, and reduced T2DM-related long-term complications, while adherence to HF guidelines reduced hospitalizations due to HF. Evidence gaps were identified, including the need to assess the impact of guideline adherence on economic outcomes, the impact of adherence to diagnosis and monitoring guidelines, and the impact of guideline adherence on QoL outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Adherence to disease management guidelines improves the outcomes of patients with T2DM or HF and reduces disease-related complications and hospitalizations; however, key evidence gaps exist, particularly regarding patients with T2DM along with comorbidities in the CVRM spectrum.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.098
Threshold uncertainty score0.676

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.430
Teacher spread0.371 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it