Being the “Better” student: intentions to reduce food waste
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract This study identifies factors that influence the behavioral intentions of German university students to reduce food waste, particularly the moderating role of environmental consciousness. Data were collected through a survey of 368 university students in Germany. The findings show that individual attitudes, environmental knowledge, and awareness of consequences affect students’ behavioral intentions to reduce food waste. In addition, the study introduces as a key moderating factor the concept of environmental consciousness, which strengthens the positive associations between individual attitude, environmental knowledge, and behavioral intention to reduce food waste. The moderating role of environmental consciousness in the relationship between awareness of consequences and behavioral intention is not significant, however. This research uniquely examines the factors promoting food waste reduction among university students in Germany, a group underexplored in current studies. Its insights can inform targeted interventions and enhance the understanding of sustainable behaviors in younger demographics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it