Reinforcement learning-based business model construction and analysis of the sports industry
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In recent years, due to the adjustment of economic structure, the people’s living standard and the increase of leisure time, the sports industry has become a new economic growth point. This paper studies and analyzes the characteristics of the industry background and business background of the sports industry, explores the factors and internal driving force affecting the design of its business model, and fully analyzes the mechanism, functional role, and logical relationship of the elements for constructing the business model of the sports industry, and then explores the characteristics of the business style of the sports industry. From the perspective of knowledge state, using the reinforcement learning mechanism, the evolution process of the sports industry business model from the first stage to the fourth stage is described. Taking Company H as a research case, the process and economic effect of the transformation and upgrading of its business model through the reinforcement learning mechanism is analyzed and it is found that as of 2023 the company’s operating income has increased by 2.4 times through transformation and upgrading, and its net profit has increased by 125.57 percentage points compared to 2016. It further understands the role that the enhanced learning mechanism brings to the development of the sports industry, and expects to be able to provide a reference for the sports industry to carry out business model transformation in the future.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".