Machine learning and combinatorial analysis-based recognition of sports activity: An investigation using SVM and KNN classifiers
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study applies Support Vector Machine (SVM) and K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN) algorithms to classify five types of basketball footwork. SVM maps the training data into a high-dimensional space using nonlinear transformation and classifies it with support vectors and a hyperplane. Experimental analysis showed minimal differences in peak and trough values of footwork movements; therefore, only mean and standard deviation features were retained, resulting in 12 effective features. KNN experiments demonstrated that recognition accuracy varies with different K values. The highest accuracy (80.7%) was achieved when K = 5 with the selected features. The study also examined the physical characteristics of basketball players, analyzing height, weight, and other indicators. Statistical results showed no significant body shape differences between experimental and control groups (P > 0.05). A T-test on dribbling, shooting, and layup performance also revealed no significant differences between the groups (P > 0.05).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it