MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408928446 · doi:10.3390/diagnostics15070857

Assessment of Inter-Reader Reliability of Fazekas Scoring on Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Brain in Adult Patients with Sickle Cell Disease

2025· article· en· W4408928446 on OpenAlexaff
Aoife M. Haughey, Roisin M. O’Cearbhaill, Stéphanie Forté, Joanna D. Schaafsma, Kevin H.M. Kuo, Igor Gomes Padilha

Bibliographic record

VenueDiagnostics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoQueen's UniversityCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de MontréalUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMagnetic resonance imagingDiseaseNuclear magnetic resonanceMedicineReliability (semiconductor)NeurosciencePsychologyInternal medicinePhysicsRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background/Objectives: Cerebral white matter disease is a common finding in patients with sickle cell that has been linked to cognitive impairment. However, there is no standardized approach for quantification of the cerebral disease burden. The Fazekas score is widely used to quantify the burden of white matter disease in chronic small vessel disease. However, its utility in sickle cell disease, specifically the inter-rater variability, has not been established. Methods: A patient cohort was compiled for the purpose of a research ethics board (REB)-approved retrospective study of adult patients with sickle cell disease, each of whom underwent MRI/MRA between the years 2017 and 2019. A total of 90 such patients were captured. All MRI/MRA studies were performed on three Tesla MRIs. Two independent neuroradiologists assessed the axial FLAIR MRI brain sequence (see image 1) for each of the 90 patients, with the sole focus of assigning a Fazekas score (0–3) to each study as a means of quantifying the burden of ischemic white matter lesions. The neuroradiologists were blinded to the scoring assigned by their counterpart and to the clinical information. After the initial assessment was completed, studies with discrepant Fazekas scores were documented and discussed by both readers. A consensus Fazekas score was then assigned to each of these studies. Results: Cohen’s weighted kappa was used as a measure of agreement between readers. The expected agreement was 74.65%, with an observed agreement of 94.44% between readers, with a kappa of 0.7808. Conclusions: We conclude on the basis of our study that there is good inter-reader reliability of Fazekas scoring on axial FLAIR MRI brain sequence in patients with sickle cell disease. The Fazekas is a promising measure that could easily be integrated in systematic evaluation of cerebrovascular lesions of adults with sickle cell disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.040
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.068
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.040
Threshold uncertainty score0.209

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0400.068
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDiagnosticsSame topicHemoglobinopathies and Related DisordersFrench-language works237,207