The Relationship Between Emotional Regulation, Resilience And Quarter Life Crisis In Final Year Student
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Emerging adulthood is the transition period from adolescence to adulthood, happening between the ages of 18 and 29. During this stage, people face many challenges, such as learning new skills and adapting to changes, especially final-year university students. The emotional struggle experienced in this phase is called the quarter-life crisis. This study aims to understand the relationship between emotion regulation, resilience, and the quarter-life crisis among final-year university students in Pekanbaru. Data were collected through an online questionnaire from 155 students and analyzed using multiple regression analysis. The results show that emotion regulation and resilience are connected to the quarter-life crisis (F = 51.020, p < 0.05). Individually, emotion regulation (t = -4.321, p < 0.05) and resilience (t = -4.129, p < 0.05) have a negative relationship with the quarter-life crisis. This means that the better a person can regulate emotions and be resilient, the lower their chances of experiencing a quarter-life crisis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".