MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408935432 · doi:10.1109/tpwrs.2025.3555858

Adaptive Dynamic State Estimation in Power Systems With Real-Time Y-Bus Matrix Estimation: A Step Toward Greater Practicality

2025· article· en· W4408935432 on OpenAlexafffund
Shahin Riahinia, Amir Ameli, Mohsen Ghafouri, Abdulsalam Yassine

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Power Systems · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower System Optimization and Stability
Canadian institutionsConcordia UniversityLakehead University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsEstimationElectric power systemComputer scienceState (computer science)Control theory (sociology)Matrix (chemical analysis)Power (physics)Estimation theoryControl engineeringEngineeringAlgorithmControl (management)Artificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dynamic State Estimation (DSE) has become pivotal in power system regulation and real-time contingency analysis, thanks to advancements in Phasor Measurement Units (PMUs) and Wide-Area Measurement Systems (WAMS). Traditionally, DSE relies on accurate, up-to-date information regarding system topology and loads. Maintaining precise estimations of these dynamic parameters is challenging and crucial for effective control and protection actions within power grids. This paper addresses the limitations of traditional DSE methods by relaxing the assumption that the admittance (i.e., Y-bus) matrix must be provided as an input at every time step. Instead, an adaptive variable forgetting-factor Recursive Least Squares (RLS) estimator is proposed for real-time Y-bus matrix estimation. This innovative approach leverages the inverse power flow equations to dynamically estimate the reduced Y-bus while simultaneously performing state estimation. To enhance accuracy and responsiveness, the estimator is integrated with the Gauss-Newton Variable Forgetting Factor (GN-VFF), allowing for precise adjustments and efficient tracking of changes. Implemented within a batch-mode regression-based Extended Kalman Filter (EKF), the GN-VFF-enhanced Y-bus estimator bridges the gap between theoretical assumptions and practical implementation. The effectiveness of this approach is validated through various scenarios on the IEEE 14-bus test system, demonstrating its potential to improve the practicality and performance of DSE in power systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Power SystemsSame topicPower System Optimization and StabilityFrench-language works237,207