MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408938078 · doi:10.1093/jts/flaf027

Welcoming the Stranger: Abrahamic Hospitality and Its Contemporary Implications. Edited by Ori Z. Soltes and Rachel Stern

2025· article· en· W4408938078 on OpenAlexaff
Brittany N. Melton

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Theological Studies · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicBiblical Studies and Interpretation
Canadian institutionsRegent College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHospitalitySternSociologyEnvironmental ethicsPhilosophyHistoryPolitical scienceLawAncient historyTourism

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This edited volume is a compilation of papers from two occasions initiated and sponsored by The Fritz Ascher Society for Persecuted, Ostracized, and Banned Art. The first was a conference held in 2019 at Georgetown University in Washington, DC. The second was held in 2022 at Fordham University Law School’s Institute on Religion, Law, and Lawyer’s Work in New York City. Both iterations focused on theological perspectives from the Abrahamic traditions on ‘hospitality to the stranger’ (p. xv) for the purpose of engaging practically with contemporary immigration, particularly with regard to the USA. Another occasion of sorts for this publication was the first term of Donald Trump’s presidency, which nearly a century after the Immigration Act of 1924 similarly tightened strictures on immigration to the USA to an unprecedented degree. ‘At its core, the book contributes to the ongoing dialogue around immigration and displacement, and challenges us to reflect on our attitudes toward newcomers’ by returning to the religious roots of hospitality (p. xiii).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0120.022
Scholarly communication0.0130.009
Open science0.0020.007
Research integrity0.0050.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Theological StudiesSame topicBiblical Studies and InterpretationFrench-language works237,207