A data-driven approach to model spatial dose characteristics for catheter placement of high dose-rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: High dose rate brachytherapy (HDR BT) is a common treatment modality for cancer. In HDR BT, a radioactive source is placed inside or close to a tumor, aiming to give a high enough dose to the tumor, while sparing nearby healthy tissue and organs at risk. Treatment planning of HDR BT for prostate cancer consists of two types of decisions, placement of catheters, modeled with binary variables, and dwell times, modeled with continuous non-negative variables. Optimal spatial placement of catheters is important for avoiding local recurrence and complications, but such characteristics have not been modeled for the combined treatment planning problem of catheter placement and dwell time optimization. METHOD: We propose a data-driven approach using linear regression, mutual information, and random forests to find convex estimates of spatial dose characteristics that correlate well with contiguous volumes receiving a too-high (hot spots) or too-low dose (cold spots). These estimates were incorporated in retrospective treatment plan optimization of 28 prostate cancer patients. RESULTS: The proposed hot-spot terms reduced the volume receiving twice the prescribed dose by 29% at 14 catheters. Also, the results illustrate the trade-offs between the number of catheters and spatial dose characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that incorporating a term for hot spots in the objective function of the treatment planning model is more effective in reducing hot spots than catheter placements that are not optimized for hot spots.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".