An Effective and Fast Model for Characterization of Cardiac Arrhythmia and Congestive Heart Failure
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Cardiac arrhythmia (ARR) and congestive heart failure (CHF) are heart diseases that can cause dysfunction of other body organs and possibly death. This paper describes a fast and accurate detection system to distinguish between ARR and normal sinus (NS), and between CHF and NS. Methods: the proposed automatic detection system uses the higher amplitude coefficients (HAC) of the discrete cosine transform (DCT) of the electrocardiogram (ECG) as discriminant features to distinguish ARR and CHF signals from NS. The approach is tested with three statistical classifiers, of which the k-nearest neighbors (k-NN) algorithm. Results: the DCT provides fast compression of the ECG signal, and statistical tests show that the obtained HACs are different from ARR and NS, and for CHF and NS. The latter achieved highest accuracy under ten-fold cross-validation in comparison to Naïve Bayes (NB) and nonlinear support vector machine (SVM). The kNN yielded 97% accuracy, 99% sensitivity, 90% specificity and 0.63 s processing time when classifying ARR against NS, and it yielded 99% accuracy, 99.7% sensitivity, and 99.2% specificity, and 0.27 seconds processing time when classifying HCF against NS. In addition to a fast response, the DCT-kNN system yields higher accuracy in comparison to recent works. Conclusions: it is concluded that using the DCT based HACs as biomarkers of ARR and CHF can lead an efficient computer aided diagnosis (CAD) system which is fast, accurate and does not require ECG signal pre-processing and segmentation. The proposed system is promising for applications in clinical milieu.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".