Real-Time Player Engagement Measurement Using Nonintrusive Game Telemetry
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Player engagement is crucial for the success of modern video games, yet its real-time measurement remains challenging due to the intrusive nature of traditional measurement methods. In this article, we present a novel framework for nonintrusive, real-time, and indirect measurement of engagement in multiplayer online games based on flow theory. Our approach combines graph convolutional networks for modeling player interactions with Transformer networks for temporal processing, enabling indirect measurement of both player skill and game challenge, which in turn are used to classify player engagement. Using playerunknown’s battlegrounds (PUBGs) as a case study, we demonstrate that our framework can effectively measure phase-specific engagement using one minute of gameplay telemetry data. Our framework achieves 73% accuracy and 0.83 ROC-AUC in engagement classification, matching the performance of traditional survey-based methods while operating nonintrusively and in real time. Further cross-domain validation of the framework, as is and without transfer learning, with the games FIFA’23 and Street Fighter V, leads to 66% accuracy, demonstrating the model’s stable performance despite the significant differences in the test domains. Interestingly, our results suggest that objective gameplay metrics may better reflect engagement than subjective player assessments, with skill estimates showing significant correlation with self-reports.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".