MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408941241 · doi:10.1109/jiot.2025.3555546

Learning Resilient Distributed Channel Access Policies in V2I Networks Under Intelligent Jamming

2025· article· en· W4408941241 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Internet of Things Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSecurity in Wireless Sensor Networks
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceJammingComputer networkChannel (broadcasting)Distributed computingComputer security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

While the Internet of Vehicles (IoV) can revolutionize transportation systems through intelligent connectivity, a critical challenge in realizing this potential lies in ensuring efficient channel allocation in the IoV ecosystem, particularly considering dynamic channel conditions and adversarial jamming exacerbated by the emergence of artificial intelligence (AI)-based jamming. To address these challenges, in this study, we use distributed edge intelligence (DEI) to propose a distributed channel access mechanism for the vehicle-to-infrastructure (V2I) mode of IoV networks. Specifically, using an actor-critic-based multiagent reinforcement learning (MARL) framework with a common critic, we model the distributed channel access problem in V2I communications under varying channel conditions and an intelligent jamming device <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$(\tt {iJD})$ </tex-math></inline-formula> interference as a decentralized partially observable stochastic game (Dec-POSG). Furthermore, by addressing challenges, such as partial observations, nonstationarity, and credit assignment, our proposed approach fosters collaboration among intelligent vehicles (<inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\tt {iV}$ </tex-math></inline-formula>s) without direct communication. In addition, our unique counterfactual reasoning-aided action evaluation mechanism and a novel utility function design enable the <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\tt {iV}$ </tex-math></inline-formula>s to learn mixed collaborative-competitive channel access policies, thereby enhancing channel utilization, mitigating the impact of the <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\tt {iJD}$ </tex-math></inline-formula>, and improving the network’s sum cross-layer achievable rate (SCLAR).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.708
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it