MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408951588 · doi:10.1109/jestie.2025.3555553

Real-Time State of Power Estimation of a Lithium-Ion Battery Using Robust OCV and Internal Resistance Estimates

2025· article· en· W4408951588 on OpenAlexafffund
Prarthana Pillai, Krishna R. Pattipati, Stephen Reaburn, Balakumar Balasingam

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Industrial Electronics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Battery Technologies Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsInternal resistanceBattery (electricity)Lithium (medication)EstimationLithium-ion batteryPower (physics)State (computer science)Resistance (ecology)Automotive engineeringComputer scienceControl theory (sociology)Environmental scienceEngineeringMedicineAlgorithmThermodynamicsPhysicsArtificial intelligenceBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article considers the problem of estimating the state of power (SOP) of a battery in real time. The SOP refers to maximum power that a battery can absorb or release during charging and discharging, respectively. The SOP is determined using the open circuit voltage (OCV) and internal resistance of the battery, both of which change with the state of charge (SOC). Existing approaches employ nonlinear system identification techniques that require the knowledge of the battery parameters, especially the parameters of the OCV–SOC characteristics. Further, the estimates of SOP from existing approaches are sensitive to factors such as temperature, SOC, aging, and OCV–SOC characterization parameters. This article presents a novel approach to SOP estimation based on a novel observation model that is independent of temperature, SOC, aging, and OCV–SOC characterization parameters. The proposed approach does not require nonlinear approaches for both system identification and filtering; instead, a linear least squares estimation technique is utilized to estimate the two parameters needed for SOP computation. The SOP estimates computed through the proposed approach are tested using realistic battery data collected from three battery cells at the following eight different temperatures: <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$-\text{25}\,^\circ {\text{C}}$</tex-math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$-\text{15}\,^\circ {\text{C}}$</tex-math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$-\text{5}\,^\circ {\text{C}}$</tex-math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\text{5}\,^\circ {\text{C}}$</tex-math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\text{15}\,^\circ {\text{C}}$</tex-math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\text{25}\,^\circ {\text{C}}$</tex-math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\text{35}\,^\circ {\text{C}}$</tex-math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\text{45}\,^\circ {\text{C}}$</tex-math></inline-formula>. From this analysis, it was observed that the proposed SOP estimation technique exhibited an SOP estimation error of 0.5 W across all the chosen temperatures except for very low SOC regions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.162
Threshold uncertainty score0.555

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Industrial ElectronicsSame topicAdvanced Battery Technologies ResearchFrench-language works237,207