MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408951633 · doi:10.1109/jestie.2025.3555499

High-Order Exponential Integrator Algorithm for Real-Time Simulation of Power Electronic Systems

2025· article· en· W4408951633 on OpenAlexafffund
Jared Paull, Liwei Wang, Wei Li

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Industrial Electronics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReal-time simulation and control systems
Canadian institutionsOpal-Rt Technologies (Canada)Okanagan University CollegeUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsIntegratorExponential functionOrder (exchange)Computer sciencePower (physics)Electric power systemControl theory (sociology)AlgorithmMathematicsPhysicsArtificial intelligenceTelecommunicationsBandwidth (computing)Mathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Real-time (RT) electromagnetic transient simulation is growing in popularity for hardware-in-the-loop (HIL) simulation of physical hardware devices. This article proposes a variable-step high-order RT exponential integrator (RTEI) algorithm that is well suited for HIL studies, particularly for controller HIL studies with digital controllers. The RTEI algorithm relies on the precomputation of matrix exponentials to offload runtime complexity. The RTEI algorithm works at each intracontrol cycle and aims to only recalculate system states at switching events. The proposed solver flexibly adapts the number of forcing function terms to achieve high accuracy with a minimum number of computed points. The proposed algorithm is L-stable, making it generally applicable to power electronic systems. A case study validates the accuracy of the proposed algorithm by comparing it with hardware experimental results. Further case studies benchmark the computational efficiency of the proposed solver with a fixed-step Trapezoidal rule-backward Euler solver (TR-BE), ART5, and an existing discrete hybrid time-step (DHT) algorithm. It is shown that the proposed algorithm achieves over 10-fold and 2-fold efficiency increases in TR-BE and DHT, respectively. The advantages of the proposed algorithm lie in both efficiency increases for general circuit topologies and the stability of the algorithm in the presence of high network stiffness.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.148
Threshold uncertainty score0.803

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Industrial ElectronicsSame topicReal-time simulation and control systemsFrench-language works237,207