MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408956912 · doi:10.1093/jaoacint/qsaf029

Maple Syrup Adulteration: Fluorescence Fingerprints as a Source of Information for Enhanced Detection

2025· article· en· W4408956912 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of AOAC International · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicPlant-Derived Bioactive Compounds
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaUniversity of Guelph
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsAdulterantChemistryMapleFluorescenceArtificial intelligenceChromatographyFood sciencePattern recognition (psychology)Biological systemAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Computer scienceBotanyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Maple syrup is often adulterated by dilution or substitution with other syrups due to its high demand and price. Fingerprinting techniques, e.g., DNA barcoding, detect adulteration in other foods. However, extensive processing during the transformation of sap into syrup degrades the genetic material, lowering the efficacy of this approach. In contrast, fluorescence fingerprints, obtained from excitation-emission matrixes (EEMs), rely on a sample's intrinsic fluorophores to provide valuable information for detecting adulteration. OBJECTIVE: This study evaluates the capabilities and limitations of EEMs to scout for adulteration markers and discriminate between pure and adulterated maple syrup samples. METHODS: EEMs of pure amber and dark maple syrups and admixtures with common adulterants (beet, corn, and rice syrups at 1-50%) were obtained using a spectrophotometer (λex = 250-500 nm, and λem = 280-650 nm). The major components of the EEMs were identified using parallel factor analysis (PARAFAC) and confirmed by LC-tandem MS (LC-MS/MS). The ratio of intensities of the two most prevalent EEM features was calculated. An artificial neural network (ANN) and a convolutional neural network (CNN) were developed to analyze the EEMs based on emissions at two selected excitation wavelengths and the full EEM image, respectively, to discriminate presence and level of adulteration. RESULTS: EEMs of the samples allowed identifying valuable discriminatory information. The efficacy of the ratio of the emission intensities at λem = 350 and 425 nm (I425/I350) when λex = 290 nm to identify potential fraud (70-86% correct identifications) depended on the adulterant. This ratio was particularly effective for beet syrup adulteration, even at concentrations <2%. Applying machine learning algorithms improved detection for all adulterants. ANN correctly identified adulteration type and level (90 and 82%). The CNN approach accurately classified 75-99% of adulterated syrups but required additional computational power and denser data sets. CONCLUSION: This study aids in providing a quick, non-destructive, and green monitoring tool for maple syrup adulteration based on its intrinsic fluorophores. HIGHLIGHTS: Maple syrup is often adulterated with other syrups due to high demand and price. DNA barcoding is ineffective in detecting maple syrup adulteration due to DNA degradation. Fluorescence fingerprints or EEMs allow scouting for discriminatory markers in maple syrup. Machine learning algorithms (ANN and CNN) applied to EEM data can aid detection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.270
Threshold uncertainty score0.356

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it