Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pentecostals are people of story.We gravitate to the narrative account of the early church in Acts, giving it a special place in our theology.We prioritize the testimony of what God has done and is doing.We see ourselves as part of God's ongoing story.Yet, we do not know the story of our Pentecostal movement in Canada very well.This is not entirely surprising as writings from these early years have been difficult to access, and because of the nature of these early writings.To begin with the nature of these writings, Mittelstadt and Courtney note how early Canadian Pentecostals were not focused on preserving history for future generations.Yes, they were eager to testify of what God was doing, and they wrote many newsletters sharing their testimonies, but this was not out of a concern for preserving history.It was about announcing the imminent return of Christ.Time was short and so they did not think of recording lengthy histories for future generations.Still, these early newsletters contain a rich account of the early years of our movement.As to the issue of accessibility, these early writings have now been made accessible in the Canadian Pentecostal Reader.Mittelstadt and Courtney have gathered these early writings into one volume.Their aim in making these writings widely accessible is not to bring us back to some golden era, but to provide us with the texts that can help us understand things the way they were, to understand the story of our movement.They have reproduced all early Pentecostal writing from 1907-1925, except for The Canadian Pentecostal Testimony, an official publication from the Pentecostal Assemblies of Canada, as it can be found online.1907 marks the first publication in Canada and 1925 serves as a natural ending point for this collection because this is when eastern and western Pentecostal groups came together under the Pentecostal Assemblies of Canada's (PAOC) 1919 charter.The book is organized around geography and publication dates.Each chapter begins with a brief introduction from the editors on the people and their publication, as well as suggested reading for more information.Then they reproduce the primary sources, intentionally including the dimensions and layout of the original publications so that the reader has in mind what the original copies would have looked like.The first chapter takes us to East End Mission in Toronto.It is necessary to begin with Ellen and James Hebden, and their newsletter The Promise, because their ministry influenced many subsequent leaders in the Canadian Pentecostal movement.Chapter two stays in Toronto but jumps forward to the 1924 magazine The Gospel of Sunshine produced by Willard and Christine Peirce.Next we move to Winnipeg.Chapter three focuses on the Argue family, reproducing the Apostolic Messenger from 1908 and The Revival Broadcast from 1923.Chapter four reproduces the surviving copies of Frank Small's Living Waters from 1918-1924.Chapter five returns east to Ottawa where we read The Good Report published by R.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.038 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".