Adenofibroma of the uterine tube in a pig
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A 10-y-old, 145-kg, pet Large Black domestic pig with a history of heart failure, which was unresponsive to furosemide, and an enlarged abdomen was submitted for postmortem examination. An 11-kg, pale-pink, firm, multinodular mass was found in the region of the right ovary. On histologic examination, the mass appeared to originate from the wall of the uterine tube; there was no evidence of metastasis. Histologically, the mass was a biphasic tumor of epithelial and spindle cells. The epithelium was proliferative, not trapped residual glands, and was randomly dispersed through the spindle cell population as clusters and tubules lined by a monolayer of cuboidal cells. The spindle cell population resembled a fibroma with abundant collagen. There were no mitotic figures in either of the neoplastic cell populations. The uterus had cystic endometrial hyperplasia. Based on the histologic and immunohistochemical findings, this case fulfills the criteria of an adenofibroma.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".