Euler inversion: locating sources of potential-field data through inversion of Euler’s homogeneity equation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
SUMMARY Locating the sources of observed disturbances in potential-field data is a challenging problem due to the non-unique nature of the inverse problem. The Euler deconvolution method was created to solve this issue, particularly for idealized sources (such as spheres and planar vertical dykes). Euler deconvolution has become widely used in potential-field methods due, in large part, to its low-computational cost and ease of implementation into software. However, it is widely known that Euler deconvolution suffers from some shortcomings: (1) non-uniqueness of the solution with respect to the depth of the source and the structural index (a parameter that represents the idealized shape of the source); (2) sensitivity to short-wavelength noise in the data derivatives which are used as inputs for the method. Here, we present a new method called Euler inversion which is a reformulation of the inverse problem of Euler’s homogeneity equation as an implicit mathematical model rather than a parametric one. Euler inversion is a constrained, nonlinear inverse problem capable of estimating both the model parameters (location of the source and constant base level) and the predicted data (potential field and its derivatives). We show that Euler inversion is less sensitive than Euler deconvolution to short-wavelength noise and to the presence of interfering sources in the data window. By also estimating the predicted data, Euler inversion is also able to estimate the best integer structural index to be used for inversion. Our results show that the estimated structural index minimizes the data misfit and coincides with those of the simulated sources. Furthermore, most matrices involved in the method are either sparse or diagonal, making Euler inversion computationally efficient. Tests on synthetic data and a real aeromagnetic data set from Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, demonstrate the effectiveness of Euler inversion to delineate sources with variable geometries and correctly estimate their depths.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".