MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408963841 · doi:10.1038/s41597-025-04863-7

Multimodal precision MRI of the individual human brain at ultra-high fields

2025· article· en· W4408963841 on OpenAlexaff
Donna Gift Cabalo, Ilana R. Leppert, Risavarshni Thevakumaran, Jordan DeKraker, Youngeun Hwang, Jessica Royer, Valeria Kebets, Shahin Tavakol, Yezhou Wang, Yigu Zhou, Oualid Benkarim, Nicole Eichert, Casey Paquola, Julien Doyon, Christine Tardif, David A. Rudko, Jonathan Smallwood, Raúl Rodríguez‐Cruces, Boris C. Bernhardt

Bibliographic record

VenueScientific Data · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdvanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsQueen's UniversityMcGill UniversityMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
FundersWellcome Trust
KeywordsHuman brainComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceComputational biologyNeurosciencePsychologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Multimodal neuroimaging, in particular magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), allows for non-invasive examination of human brain structure and function across multiple scales. Precision neuroimaging builds upon this foundation, enabling the mapping of brain structure, function, and connectivity patterns with high fidelity in single individuals. Highfield MRI, operating at magnetic field strengths of 7 Tesla (T) or higher, increases signal-to-noise ratio and opens up possibilities for gains spatial resolution. Here, we share a multimodal Precision Neuroimaging and Connectomics (PNI) 7 T MRI dataset. Ten healthy individuals underwent a comprehensive MRI protocol, including T1 relaxometry, magnetization transfer imaging, T2*-weighted imaging, diffusion MRI, and multi-state functional MRI paradigms, aggregated across three imaging sessions. Alongside anonymized raw MRI data, we release cortex-wide connectomes from different modalities across multiple parcellation scales, and supply "gradients" that compactly characterize spatial patterning of cortical organization. Our precision MRI dataset will advance our understanding of structure-function relationships in the individual human brain and is publicly available via the Open Science Framework.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.374
Teacher spread0.322 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScientific DataSame topicAdvanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207