Extremely Stable 10 kΩ Metal Foil Resistors in n Ω/Ω Level
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ultrastable metal foil 10 k$\Omega $standard resistors are developed. The resistors showed quite stable behavior and the observed long-term resistance drift was around ±10 n$\Omega $/$\Omega $in 2 years from just after the fabrication. They showed almost linear temperature characteristics from$18~{}^{\circ } $C to$28~{}^{\circ } $C, and the temperature coefficients were less than 15 (n$\Omega $/$\Omega $)/K at around$23~{}^{\circ } $C. Due to their stress-free structure, the resistance values were quite stable within 5 n$\Omega $/$\Omega $after the abrupt temperature change of about$5~{}^{\circ } $C. The humidity dependence was within ±0.2 (n$\Omega $/$\Omega $)/% at$23~{}^{\circ } $C, and they also showed stable behavior within ±10 n$\Omega $/$\Omega $against the pressure from 700 to 1200 hPa. A vibration test along with an MIL standard, MIL-STD-202, was performed, and a 2.5 k$\Omega $subsection of the 10 k$\Omega $resistor indicated stability within 10 n$\Omega $/$\Omega $after applying vibration for 2 h on each axis (6 h in total).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".