MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408971191 · doi:10.23977/acss.2025.090117

Map-less Navigation Algorithm for Autonomous Vehicles Based on Deep Reinforcement Learning

2025· article· en· W4408971191 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in Computer Signals and Systems · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicRobotic Path Planning Algorithms
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReinforcement learningArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceReinforcementComputer visionEngineeringStructural engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper focuses on the map-less navigation problem of autonomous vehicles based on deep reinforcement learning, and proposes a map-less navigation method for autonomous vehicles based on an improved Twin Delayed Deep Deterministic Policy Gradient (TD3) algorithm. Aiming at the problems of navigation success rate, exploration performance, and training time of existing map-less navigation algorithms based on deep reinforcement learning, the following innovations are used to optimize the above performance: ① Optimize the neural network structure of the TD3 algorithm to enhance the exploration ability of autonomous vehicles in complex environments. ② Construct a composite reward function to integrate dense rewards and sparse rewards, which significantly speeds up the training speed of the algorithm. Finally, the algorithm in this paper only needs 12% of the training amount of the comparison algorithm to achieve the same success rate. A comprehensive test environment and a special test environment were built in a simulation environment for comparative experiments. The results show that the navigation success rate of the algorithm in this paper is increased by 11.80% in the comprehensive test environment; the obstacle avoidance success rate is increased by 40% and 70% in the special test environment, and the exploration success rate is increased by 100%. In the test of real complex environment, the navigation algorithm is not adjusted, and it can effectively drive the autonomous vehicle to perform map-less navigation. The navigation effect and portability of the algorithm are verified.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.416
Threshold uncertainty score0.760

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it