Methacholine hyperresponsiveness in mice with house dust mite‐induced lung inflammation is not associated with excessive airway constriction ex vivo
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The role of excessive airway constriction in the hyperresponsiveness to nebulized methacholine in mice with experimental asthma is still contentious. Yet, there have been very few studies investigating whether the increased in vivo response to methacholine caused by experimental asthma is associated with a corresponding increase in ex vivo airway constriction. Herein, the responses to nebulized methacholine in vivo and airway constriction in lung slices ex vivo were studied in 8- to 10-week-old male mice of two strains, BALB/c and C57BL/6. Experimental asthma was induced by administering house dust mites (HDM) intranasally, once daily, for 10 consecutive days. Complementary ex vivo studies were conducted with excised tracheas to measure and compare isometric force. As expected, the in vivo response to methacholine, and especially the hyperresponsiveness caused by HDM, was greater in BALB/c than in C57BL/6 mice. In contrast, there were no differences in maximal airway constriction between mouse strains, and the hyperresponsiveness to nebulized methacholine caused by HDM in both mouse strains was not associated with a corresponding increase in ex vivo airway constriction. The experiments with excised tracheas demonstrated no differences in isometric force between strains and between mice with and without experimental asthma. It is concluded that the hyperresponsiveness to nebulized methacholine in an acute mouse model of asthma induced by repeated HDM exposures is not associated with excessive airway constriction ex vivo.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".