MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408975261 · doi:10.1016/j.jth.2025.102038

Canadian population-based survey of commercial drivers during the COVID-19 pandemic: Health- and safety-related factors affecting collision risk

2025· article· en· W4408975261 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Jennifer Johnson, Evelyn Vingilis, Jane Seeley, Doug Beirness, Jeffrey R. Brubacher, Brian A. Jonah, Mark Rapoport, Gina Stoduto, Branka Agic, Christine M. Wickens

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Transport & Health · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTraffic and Road Safety
Canadian institutionsCentre for Addiction and Mental HealthHealth Sciences CentreSunnybrook Health Science CentrePublic Health OntarioPublic Safety CanadaUniversity of British ColumbiaGolder Associates (Canada)University of TorontoToronto East General HospitalWestern University
FundersTransport Canada
KeywordsPandemicCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Collision2019-20 coronavirus outbreakSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)PopulationEnvironmental healthBusinessGeographyMedicineVirologyComputer scienceComputer securityDiseaseOutbreak

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Commercial motor vehicles are imperative to Canada to deliver goods and services. Timely delivery during the COVID-19 pandemic meant commercial drivers had to work longer hours in difficult conditions, with increased risk of COVID-19 exposure, morbidity and mortality. were to: (1) compare drivers with commercial drivers' licences with matched drivers without commercial drivers' licences on health and safety factors and driving during the pandemic; (2) examine predictors of collisions since the pandemic among drivers with commercial drivers’ licences. A sub-analysis of a population-based online survey of Canadian drivers was conducted examining impact of COVID-19 on health and safety factors and driving. Socio-demographics, health and driving variables were compared between matched drivers with and without commercial licences and logistic regression analysis assessed the impact of COVID-19-related health and safety factors on likelihood of commercial driver involvement in collisions. Commercial drivers drove significantly more kilometres, were more likely to have been stopped by police, and more likely to have had at least one collision during the pandemic than non-commercial drivers. No between group differences were found for distress, worry about COVID-19, vaccine status and testing positive for COVID-19, speeding, driving after alcohol or cannabis use. Drivers with commercial licences who scored higher on distress, reported less worry about COVID-19, increased speeding and being stopped by the police were all significantly associated with more self-reported collisions. Health and safety factors need to be considered for drivers with commercial licences for collision involvement in future pandemics. • Commercial licensed (CL) drivers drove more during COVID-19 than non-CL drivers. • CL drivers were equally vaccinated against COVID as non-CL drivers. • No group differences for distress, speeding and driving after alcohol or cannabis. • More CL drivers reported police stops and collisions during the pandemic. • Distress, less COVID worry, speeding and police stops predicted CL driver crashes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.253
Threshold uncertainty score0.649

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Transport & HealthSame topicTraffic and Road SafetyFrench-language works237,207