MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408977086 · doi:10.2196/71948

Intradialytic Changes and Prognostic Value of Ventriculo-Arterial Coupling in Patients With End-Stage Renal Disease: Protocol for an Observational Prospective Trial

2025· article· en· W4408977086 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Alessandro Salustri, G Tonti, Gianni Pedrizzetti, Aizhan Zhankorazova, Zaukiya Khamitova, Bauyrzhan Toktarbay, Dinara Jumadilova, Marina Khvan, Dinara Galiyeva, Makhabbat Bekbossynova, Murat Mukarov, Alexey Kokoshko, Abduzhappar Gaipov

Bibliographic record

VenueJMIR Research Protocols · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsObservational studyPreprintMedicineEnd stage renal diseaseStage (stratigraphy)DiseaseInternal medicineIntensive care medicineComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: The acute effect of hemodialysis (HD) on left ventricular mechanics has been evaluated in several studies; however, their results are not consistent. Eventually, the heart and the arterial system behave as an interconnected system and not as isolated structures; thus, the evaluation of the interaction of cardiac contractility with the arterial system would provide a more comprehensive understanding of cardiovascular function and cardiac energetics. However, there have not been any studies demonstrating changes in terms of volumes, contractility, intraventricular pressure gradient distribution, and vascular properties in response to changes in loading conditions and their impact on the outcome in patients undergoing HD. Recently, a noninvasive method for assessing left ventricular pressure-volume loop and ventriculo-arterial coupling (VAC) from feature-tracking cardiac magnetic resonance or echocardiography has been proposed. We believe that this method allows a comprehensive evaluation of the hemodynamic status of the patients undergoing HD, including the relationships between cardiac function and arterial elastance, and might provide prognostic information. OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this study is to evaluate changes in VAC before and after a HD session. The secondary objective is to assess the prognostic value of VAC parameters in predicting adverse outcomes. METHODS: A 2D transthoracic echocardiogram will be performed before and after a HD session in patients with end-stage renal disease. We target to enroll 323 patients. Images will be analyzed with advanced software based on speckle-tracking, able to reconstruct the pressure-volume loop. From the pressure-volume loop, arterial (Ea) and ventricular (Ees) elastance will be derived. VAC will be calculated as the Ea/Ees ratio. Patients will be followed up for 18 months. Primary endpoints will be a composite of all causes of death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and hospitalization due to worsening heart failure. RESULTS: The study received funding in August 2024, with patients' enrollment scheduled to take place from January 1 to June 30, 2025. Data analysis will start in April 2025 and is expected to continue until June 2026. The findings of the study are tentatively planned for publication in the winter of 2027. CONCLUSIONS: This study will provide data on the changes in VAC induced by HD and their potential prognostic value. This assessment could be useful for tailoring volume depletion during HD and to improve patients' outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06622928; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06622928. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/71948.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.017
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: Protocol
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.089

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0170.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0070.004
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0040.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.165
GPT teacher head0.479
Teacher spread0.315 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreProtocol

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJMIR Research ProtocolsSame topicCardiovascular Function and Risk FactorsFrench-language works237,207