MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4408980220 · doi:10.1113/jp287446

Intrinsic properties of spinal motoneurons degrade ankle torque control in humans

2025· article· en· W4408980220 on OpenAlexaff
James A. Beauchamp, Gregory E. P. Pearcey, Obaid U. Khurram, Francesco Negro, Julius P. A. Dewald, C. J. Heckman

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physiology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMuscle activation and electromyography studies
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human DevelopmentNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
KeywordsAnklePhysical medicine and rehabilitationTorqueNeuroscienceMedicineAnatomyBiologyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Motoneurons are the final common pathway for all motor commands and possess intrinsic electrical properties that must be tuned to control muscle across the full range of motor behaviours. Neuromodulatory input from the brainstem is probably essential for adapting motoneuron properties to match this diversity of motor tasks. A primary mechanism of this adaptation, control of dendritic persistent inward currents (PICs) in motoneurons by brainstem monoaminergic systems, generates both amplification and prolongation of synaptic inputs. While essential, there is an inherent tension between this amplification and prolongation. Although amplification by PICs allows for quick recruitment and acceleration of motoneuron discharge, PICs must be deactivated to derecruit motoneurons upon movement cessation. In contrast, during stabilizing or postural tasks, PIC-induced prolongation of synaptic inputs is critical for sustained motoneuron discharge. Here, we designed two motor tasks that challenged the inhibitory control of PICs, generating unduly PIC prolongation that increases variability in human torque control. This included a paradigm combining a discrete motor task with a stabilizing task and another involving muscle length-induced changes to the balance of excitatory and inhibitory inputs available for controlling PICs. We show that prolongation from PICs introduces difficulties in ankle torque control and that these difficulties are further degraded at shorter muscle lengths when PIC prolongation is greatest. These results highlight the necessity for inhibitory control of PICs and showcase issues introduced when inhibitory control is constrained. Our findings suggest that, like sensory systems, errors are inherent in motor systems. These errors are not due to problems in the perception of movement-related sensory input but are embedded in the final stage of motor output. This has many implications relevant to clinical conditions (e.g. chronic stroke) where pathological shifts in monoamines may further amplify these errors. KEY POINTS: All motor commands are processed via spinal motoneurons, whose intrinsic electrical properties are adapted by brainstem neuromodulatory input. The effects of these neuromodulatory inputs (i.e. persistent inward currents; PICs) must be tightly regulated by inhibitory inputs to allow for the large repertoire of human motor behaviours. We designed two motor tasks to restrict the ability of inhibitory synaptic inputs to control PICs and show that this generates substantial errors that reduce the precision of motor output in humans. Our findings suggest that errors are inherent in motor systems and embedded in the final stage of motor output. This has many implications relevant to clinical conditions (e.g. chronic stroke) and may, speculatively, shed light on contributing factors to muscle cramps.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Physiology→Same topicMuscle activation and electromyography studies→French-language works237,207→