Nonlinear dynamics of simply supported, thin laminated circular cylindrical shells coupled to large-amplitude sloshing fluid
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study investigates the nonlinear vibrations of thin laminated elastic shells with simply supported boundary conditions , subjected to large-amplitude sloshing fluid, within the framework of the Flügge-Lur’e-Byrne nonlinear shell theory . The fluid is modeled by the potential flow theory using the Laplace equation in the fluid domain, and nonlinear boundary conditions are applied at the free surface. The Lagrange multipliers method is employed to minimize the energy functional, incorporating nonlinear constraints at the fluid boundary. A harmonic excitation is applied at the mid-height of the shell, and the transient vibrations are analyzed. Results indicate that nonlinear sloshing reduces the beating action in the time-domain response but increases the radial shell deformation compared to the linear case. The effects of fluid level and nonlinearity at the fluid surface are also explored through frequency–response analysis, revealing that nonlinear sloshing significantly alters the frequency response curve , particularly for large fluid-filling ratios in flexible shells. However, the effect on the fluid free-surface profile is minimal when compared to linear slosh modeling. In contrast, stiff shells exhibit a pronounced effect of nonlinear sloshing on the fluid free-surface elevations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it