The effect of Changing Construction Materials on Historical Building Performance in Case of Restoration - Case Study of Al-Nabi Jirjis Mosque in Old Mosul City
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Choosing appropriate construction materials in restoration processes of historical buildings particularly after wars or disasters is crucial in retaining the importance of such buildings and their distinct characteristics.This study is to explore how a change of original construction materials can influence energy efficiency and thermal comfort when rebuilding the destroyed historic buildings after the war in Old Mosul, where Al-Nabi Jrjis Mosque was selected as a case study.The study has adopted a comparative method between three simulation scenarios including two sets of new materials in addition to the original one.ENVI met analysis is used as a method to simulate the three cases.Results showed that the original set of materials (stone and plaster) has characterized by the best thermal efficiency compared by new materials used in the study.However, a set of hollow concrete with PVC strip used in one of the other scenarios revealed somehow good results, which therefore can be used as an acceptable alternative if the original materials are not available.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".