MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408983463 · doi:10.62019/5ejb0e91

APPLICATION OF STEM CELLS IN TREATMENT OF ORAL LICHEN PLANUS

2025· article· en· W4408983463 on OpenAlexaff
D Amanat, Momminah Qamar, Muhammad Arif, Dr Ashar Hussain, Ali Akram

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of medical & health sciences review. · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDentistry
TopicOral Health Pathology and Treatment
Canadian institutionsCollège Montmorency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLichenOral lichen planusStem cellDermatologyMedicineBiologyBotanyCell biology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Oral lichen planus (OLP) is a chronic inflammatory mucocutaneous disorder of autoimmune origin, often presenting as painful erosive or atrophic lesions in the oral cavity. Conventional therapies such as corticosteroids and immunosuppressants offer temporary relief but are associated with side effects and recurrence. Recent advancements in regenerative medicine highlight mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), particularly gingiva-derived MSCs (GMSCs), for their immunomodulatory and regenerative potential. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the safety and clinical efficacy of autologous gingiva-derived mesenchymal stem cells in the management of erosive OLP through a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Methods: A total of 48 patients aged 30–65 years with clinically and histopathologically confirmed erosive OLP were randomized into two groups (n=24 each). The experimental group received three biweekly submucosal injections of GMSCs (1×10⁶ cells/mL), while the control group received placebo saline injections. Pain was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), lesion size measured via digital calipers, and lesion severity evaluated using the Thongprasom score. Quality of life was assessed with the OHIP-14 questionnaire, and salivary levels of IL-6 and TNF-α were analyzed using ELISA at baseline, 2, 4, and 12 weeks post-treatment. Safety and adverse events were also monitored. Results: The MSC group demonstrated significant reductions in pain (VAS: from 6.9 to 1.0), lesion size (from 86.5 mm² to 20.7 mm²), and Thongprasom score (from 4.3 to 0.8) by week 12 (p<0.001). Salivary cytokines IL-6 and TNF-α significantly decreased, indicating reduced inflammation. Adverse events were mild and comparable between groups. Conclusion: GMSC therapy is a safe and effective treatment for erosive OLP, offering substantial clinical improvement and anti-inflammatory benefits. These findings support the potential of stem cell-based therapies as a regenerative alternative for chronic oral autoimmune conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.469
Teacher spread0.410 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of medical & health sciences review.Same topicOral Health Pathology and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207