Complete mitochondrial genomes of ancyromonads provide clues for the gene content and genome structures of ancestral mitochondria
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Mitochondria of eukaryotic cells are direct descendants of an endosymbiotic bacterium related to Alphaproteobacteria. These organelles retain their own genomes, which are highly reduced and divergent when compared to those of their bacterial relatives. To better understand the trajectory of mitochondrial genome evolution from the last eukaryotic common ancestor (LECA) to extant species, mitochondrial genome sequences from phylogenetically diverse lineages of eukaryotes – particularly protists – are essential. For this reason, we focused on the mitochondrial genomes of Ancyromonadida, an independent and understudied protist lineage in the eukaryote tree of life. Here we report the mitochondrial genomes from three Ancyromonadida: Ancyromonas sigmoides , Nutomonas longa , and Fabomonas tropica . Our analyses reveal that these mitochondrial genomes are circularly mapping molecules that feature protein-coding inverted repeats. This inverted repeat structure has been observed in other mitochondrial genomes but is patchily distributed over the tree of eukaryotes. Ancyromonad mitochondrial genomes possess several protein-coding genes which have not been detected from any other mitochondrial genomes of eukaryotes sequenced to date, thereby extending the known mitochondrial gene repertoire of ancestral eukaryotes, including LECA. These findings significantly expand our understanding of mitochondrial genome diversity across eukaryotes, shedding light on the early phases of mitochondrial genome evolution in eukaryotes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".