MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408990000 · doi:10.1016/j.compag.2025.110307

Remote and automated detection of Asian hornets (Vespa velutina nigrithorax) at an apiary, using spectral features of their hovering flight sounds

2025· article· en· W4408990000 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Harriet Hall, Martin Bencsik, Nuno Capela, José Paulo Sousa, Dirk C. de Graaf

Bibliographic record

VenueComputers and Electronics in Agriculture · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInsect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersHORIZON EUROPE European Institute of Innovation and TechnologyEuropean CommissionTrent UniversityHorizon 2020 Framework ProgrammeNottingham Trent University
KeywordsApiaryComputer scienceSpeech recognitionBeekeeping

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

• Honeybees and hornets are monitored at hives, using a camcorder and microphone. • Their flight sounds differ and can be discriminated with machine learning. • Two-dimensional-Fourier-transform analysis promotes the discrimination success. • The hovering of hornets during predation is key to acoustic discrimination success. Asian hornets ( Vespa velutina nigrithorax ) are an invasive species that have spread across Europe since 2004. As V.velutina largely predate on honeybees, assessing their presence at apiaries would be useful for invasive species control programmes and beekeepers to help protect their hives. At present, hornet monitoring techniques are both costly and time consuming. A promising alternative is a remote detection strategy at apiaries, which would promote straightforward, non-invasive data acquisition. The remote capture of flight acoustics should benefit hornet detection as wingbeat frequencies have previously been described as ‘the fingerprint’ of some flying invertebrate species. We here demonstrate a non-invasive method of V.velutina detection using their hovering flight sounds, captured by microphones that can be left at an apiary over the long-term. Paired with a training algorithm (principal component analysis and discriminant function analysis) that discriminates between hornet flight and other external noises (honeybee flight sounds and general background noise), we demonstrate that hornet hovering acoustics exhibit specific spectral features that promote the detection of individuals at an apiary. The training algorithm in our study was highly accurate (98.7 %) when testing just under 1-hour of apiary recordings. Utilising two-dimensional-Fourier-transforms has also benefited this algorithm, as the analysis technique is ideal for identifying repeating features in sound/vibrational data, which are an inherent consequence of hovering hornet sounds. The experimental design and training algorithm used in this study have demonstrated excellent potential for hornet detection in the field, and are now ready to be tested on long-term, continuous data to further assess their success.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.137
Threshold uncertainty score0.422

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueComputers and Electronics in AgricultureSame topicInsect and Arachnid Ecology and BehaviorFrench-language works237,207