Whole-Genome Sequencing Reveals Individual and Cohort Level Insights into Chromosome 9p Syndromes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Previous genomic efforts on chromosome 9p deletion and duplication syndromes have utilized low resolution strategies (i.e., karyotypes, chromosome microarrays). We present the first large-scale whole-genome sequencing (WGS) study of 100 individuals from families with 9p-related syndromes including 85 unrelated probands through the 9P-ARCH ( A dvanced R esearch in C hromosomal H ealth: Genomic, Phenotypic, and Functional Aspects of 9p -Related syndromes) research network. We analyzed the genomic architecture of these syndromes, highlighting fundamental features and their commonalities and differences across individuals. This work includes a machine-learning model that predicts 9p deletion syndrome from gene copy number estimates using WGS data. Two Late Replicating Regions (LRR1 [a previously un-named human fragile site], LRR2) were identified that contain most structural variant breakpoints in 9p deletion syndrome pointing to replication-based issues in structural variant formation. Furthermore, we show the utility of using WGS information to obtain a comprehensive understanding of 9p-related variation in an individual with complex structural variation where chromothripsis is the likely mechanism. Genes on 9p were prioritized based on statistical assessment of human genomic variation. Furthermore, through application of spatial transcriptomics to embryonic mouse tissue we examined 9p-gene expression in craniofacial and brain development. Through these strategies, we identified 24 important genes for the majority (83%) of individuals with 9p deletion syndrome including AK3, BRD10, CD274, CDC37L1, DMRT1, DMRT2, DMRT3, DOCK8, GLIS3, JAK2, KANK1, KDM4C, PLPP6, PTPRD, PUM3, RANBP6, RCL1 , RFX3 , RIC1 , SLC1A1 , SMARCA2 , UHRF2 , VLDLR , and ZNG1A . Two genes ( AK3 , ZNG1A ) are involved in mitochondrial function and testing of the mitochondrial genome revealed excess copy number in individuals with 9p deletion syndrome. This study presents the most comprehensive genomic analysis of 9p-related syndromes to date, with plans for further expansion through our 9P-ARCH research network.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".