MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408991174 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-2025-67

The Aerosol Limb Imager: Multi-spectral Polarimetric Observations of Stratospheric Aerosol

2025· preprint· en· W4408991174 on OpenAlexaff
Daniel Letros, Liam Graham, Adam Bourassa, D. A. Degenstein, Paul Loewen, Landon Rieger, N. D. Lloyd

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPlanetary Science and Exploration
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAerosolPolarimetryRemote sensingEnvironmental scienceGeologyMeteorologyPhysicsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. The Aerosol Limb Imager (ALI) is designed to measure stratospheric aerosol by imaging limb-scattered sunlight. Each image taken by ALI is spectrally filtered at a tunable wavelength, and refined to consist of either horizontally or vertically polarized light. Novel to limb imaging, these polarized observations of ALI provide a means to isolate tangent altitudes which have signal contaminated by clouds. This avoids the ambiguity caused by clouds to be interpreted as aerosol in a retrieval. We present a polarized aerosol retrieval methodology which retrieves vertically resolved aerosol number density, and median radius of a uni-modal log-normal distribution, in addition to a scalar width. We explore the cloud discrimination and aerosol retrieval of ALI in simulation as validation of the efficacy and the limits to the technique. We then apply the retrieval to three example sets of observations taken from the most recent high-altitude balloon flight of ALI. One set provides a nominal exemplar, while the other two represent more difficult retrieval conditions of an increasingly polarized atmosphere. We compare the aerosol extinction of ALI in all three exemplar cases to the best coincident extinctions of three space based instruments: the Stratospheric Aerosol and Gas Experiment (SAGE III), the Ozone Mapping and Profiler Suite (OMPS), and the Optical Spectrograph and InfraRed Imaging System (OSIRIS). We provide discussion to the agreement of all three cases against the comparison instruments with respected to the efficacy of our approach. However, we find the retrieved aerosol extinction of ALI in the nominal case is in good agreement to the extinction reported by SAGE III, OMPS, and OSIRIS while also yielding aerosol particle size information.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPlanetary Science and ExplorationFrench-language works237,207